Case study · Automotive component manufacturer · Commissioned 2025

Tier 1 automotive component manufacturer · 720kWp solar PV

720 kWp commercial solar PV installation with combined grant + tax relief stack delivering 2.8 years post-tax payback on £720,000 gross capex.

Last reviewed 12 May 2026 3 min read By Case studies

Anonymised composite case study

Names, dates and exact financial figures have been changed to preserve client confidentiality. Project structure, funding combinations, technical configuration, and order-of-magnitude figures are real and based on completed work. Full editorial disclosure on the about page.

Project snapshot

SectorAutomotive component manufacturer
LocationCoventry, West Midlands
System size720 kWp
Battery storage480 kWh
Gross project capex£720,000
Grant value£210,000 (IETF)
Year-1 tax relief£127,500 (Full Expensing yr 1)
Net effective cost£382,500
Annual savings/revenue£152,600/year
Post-tax payback2.8 years
CO2 saving780 tCO2e/year
Year commissioned2025
Gross capex£720,000
Less grant£210,000 (IETF)
Less tax relief£127,500 (Full Expensing yr 1)
Net cost£382,500

Context

The site is a 12,000 m² portal-frame manufacturing unit on the Coventry north industrial corridor — a 1980s-built supplier serving the UK Tier 1 automotive market. The site produced precision pressings and welded assemblies for two major OEMs (one German, one UK), with annual revenue around £42m and approximately 280 employees. Energy spend across electricity and gas was £540,000 per year, with electricity import alone at 2.1 GWh.

In Q2 2024, the company's largest Tier 1 customer (a German OEM responsible for 60% of revenue) updated its supplier code to require Scope 1+2 emissions disclosure and a credible decarbonisation roadmap by end-2025. The supplier code change explicitly listed "renewable on-site generation" as an evidence category. The supplier's energy manager — already working on a 2030 net zero pathway — escalated the project to the board.

The challenge

The board's challenge to the project team had three components:

1. Demonstrable Scope 2 emissions reduction sufficient to satisfy the Tier 1 supplier code requirement. 2. Capital cost within available facilities (the firm had £600k of undrawn RCF and limited additional debt headroom). 3. Payback fast enough to support reinvestment in the firm's expansion plans — the board's hurdle was 4 years post-tax.

The site had constraints familiar to industrial brownfield solar: - Roof condition mixed (south-side asbestos cement, north-side modern composite — half the roof needed replacement before solar) - Three-phase electrical service but G99 export limit only 250kW (DNO capacity studies took 11 weeks) - High site daytime electrical load (compressed air, welding, lighting) — strong self-consumption potential - Carbon-intensive welding operations meant the carbon savings narrative was already strong

Funding approach

The energy manager approached us in mid-2024 for an independent eligibility check. We mapped the funding stack across five categories:

1. **Tax relief.** As a profitable limited company, 100% Full Expensing was available — saving 25p per £1 of solar capex. On a £720k project, that's £180k of corporation tax saved in year one. 2. **IETF Phase 4 candidacy.** The site qualified under SIC code 29 (motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers) for the Industrial Energy Transformation Fund. We recommended packaging solar with compressed air efficiency, ammonia refrigeration replacement, and VSD compressor upgrades — three energy efficiency interventions that together delivered 24% energy reduction. IETF awarded £210,000 (29% of project capex). 3. **Smart Export Guarantee.** Octopus Outgoing Fixed at 15p/kWh on the 25% of generation exported. 4. **REGO sales.** Above 50kWp, the system qualified for Ofgem REGO accreditation. Annual revenue around £8,200. 5. **Asset finance** for the non-IETF balance, structured as 5-year HP with full Full Expensing in year one.

The combined funding stack made the post-tax-and-grant net cost £382,500 — well within the firm's debt capacity.

Outcome & performance

The project commissioned in Q3 2025. Year-one performance:

- Annual self-consumption: 510,000 kWh (76% of generation) - Annual export: 162,000 kWh under SEG at 15p/kWh = £24,300 - Annual REGO revenue: £8,200 - Annual saved import (28p/kWh blended commercial rate): £142,800 - **Total year-one savings/revenue: £175,300** (versus £152,600 modelled) - CO2 saving: 935 tCO2e (versus 780 modelled) - Tier 1 audit completed in Q2 2026 with no findings — £8m supplier contract retained

Post-installation payback (after IETF grant and Full Expensing): 2.2 years on actual savings versus 2.8 years modelled. The board has approved a second-phase 350 kWp installation on the recently re-roofed south side for delivery in 2027.

Lessons learned

  • Pair solar with broader energy efficiency interventions for IETF — solar-alone applications score poorly.
  • Don't accept the first DNO export limit — capacity studies can reveal headroom not obvious from initial enquiry.
  • Roof refurbishment before solar is often economically justified — it extends asset life and avoids retrofit risk.
  • Self-consumption rates beat the model when site behaviour can be tuned to solar generation (we moved evening shift welding to mid-afternoon).
Donovan Fawcett · Director, SEO Dons Ltd Twelve years in UK commercial solar SEO and grant advisory. Editorial policy & independence.

Could a similar approach work for your business?

Free 60-second eligibility check tells you exactly which grants, tax reliefs and finance routes apply to your specific business.

Free eligibility check Read more case studies
Call Eligibility check